February 2012

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213 1415161718
19202122232425
26272829   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, August 30th, 2011 11:23 am
So a while back I posted (in LJ only, most likely) about how I sent a very terse e-mail back to a friend who had sent her umpteenth urban legend e-mail.

I sent her the appropriate link showing her it was false and then very forcefully said that if she wasn't going to look these things up first, then don't send them to me. I also advised that she should bear in mind that she could be needlessly worrying/scaring people if she sent these e-mails without verifying their veracity.

Apparently she listened to me about not including me on the distribution list for such messages, but I still ended up with the e-mail. She sent another one out but left me off the distribution list as requested, but she sent it to a mutual friend who forwarded to me.

So I found the appropriate link and sent it to the friend who sent it to me. I suggested that at the very least, she needs to send the link back to the person who sent her the e-mail.

Why don't people ever learn - no matter how many times you tell them - they really need to look these things up before mass forwarding/spamming their friends????????

I mean, really? Is it really going to interfere with your ability to have a life or kill you to take a few extra minutes before clicking "Forward"???????

Reply

From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.